Showing posts with label Entertainment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Entertainment. Show all posts

Why Streaming Services Remove Content Including Originals from their Platforms


Paramount Plus has become the latest streaming service to remove low-performing content from its vast library. Real World: Homecoming, the true-crime show Interrogation, Jordan Peele’s reboot of the Twilight Zone, the dark comedy Guilty Party, the crime drama Coyote, the comedy series No Activity, and the animated show The Harper House are all getting the axe.

Showtime and Paramount+ are in the process of merging into a single service with the unwieldy name Paramount+ with Showtime. In preparation for this integration, Showtime is also purging content. And shows with some big names attached are included. Showtime isn't kidding when they say Kidding starring Jim Carey has to go. Crime drama American Rust starring Jeff Daniels will be left to rust. Well, not really. It is getting a second season on Amazon's terribly-named Freevee service. On Becoming a God in Central Florida, a dark comedy starring Kirsten Dunst is also being pulled.

In August 2022, Variety reported that HBO Max had removed 36 titles, including 20 originals. HBO Max "attributed the decision to the pending merge of the platform with Discovery+." Several of the dropped shows were family or children's programming. AMC dropped the legal drama 61st Street even though the second season had already finished filming.

Cord Cutting For Dummies 






So why do streaming services remove shows from their platforms? And why would they remove the originals they paid so much to create. There are a few reasons. 

Taxes, Taxes, Taxes

When HBO Max canceled the Batgirl movie, taxes were a major motivator. James M. Bandoblu, Jr., a partner at New York-based law firm Hodgson Russ told Newsweek, "By shelving the Batgirl film, Warner Bros. will be able to reduce the loss incurred in producing Batgirl against its net income from other movies. Thus, the loss from Batgirl will reduce taxable income." Warner Bros. didn't think the movie would do well, so they decided to cut their losses.

Deadline made a similar point about AMC dropping content. "AMC Network said today it will take write-downs for up to $475 million as it restructures its business to cut costs." AMC calls these decisions “strategic programming assessments.”

The Hollywood Reporter also lists tax write-offs as a reason to remove original content. Another is the potential to sell the rights to a show and license it to a third party. An example of this is moving American Rust to Freevee. "Removing completed seasons allows Showtime and their competitors to take a tax write-down on content as well as shop titles that are owned in-house to third-party buyers as many seek to monetize content that underperformed."

Reducing Costs

Another big financial motivator is that by dropping titles from their platforms, streaming providers no longer have to shell out money to the casts, crews, and creators of low-performing content. When streamers drop poorly performing titles, they save money that would have been paid out as residuals to actors and writers.

Removing Clutter

Lastly, many services want to declutter by removing content few subscribers want to watch. HBO Max acquired Sesame Street in 2019 as part of a five-year deal, but children's content, including Sesame Street, isn't doing well on the platform. There is little reason to continue hosting content viewers aren't interested in watching.

Netflix is said to have a “discovery” problem because there is so much content on the platform that it's hard to find their best stuff. Streaming services don't want to get a reputation for having a lot of low-value shows and movies. Households are increasingly balking at paying high costs for cable and satellite services that are filled with rarely viewed channels. Every subscriber pays for those channels that they don't watch. The same is true for streaming services. Subscribers are paying for low-performing content they don't watch. By removing poor performers, streaming platforms can cut costs, which ultimately benefits subscribers.

Peacock Drops Free Tier for New Customers


According to The Streamable, NBC's Peacock service will no longer allow new signups for its Free Tier. New customers will only be shown the Paid Plans, which are Premium for $4.99 and Premium Plus (which includes Your Local NBC Channel LIVE, 24/7) for $9.99. Existing users will still have access to the free tier, at least for now. Peacock TV is often listed as a free streaming option because of its generous free tier.

Some of Peacock's free content serve as teasers, such as offering the first episode of a Premium show or the first two seasons of popular series like The Office and Parks and Recreation. However, there is also a lot of completely free content like Battlestar Galactica, Brooklyn Nine-Nine, Downton Abbey, Superstore, and Saturday Night Live. Several movies are offered completely free of charge.

The Streamable says the change has been confirmed by a source at NBC Universal.

"The Premium Tier is expected to grow to 100,000 hours of content in 2023, with Poker Face, live sports like the Women’s World Cup, Big Ten Football, and Premier League, and a library of shows including The Office and Yellowstone.”

Peacock offers content from NBCUniversal studios and other third-party content providers, including live NBC TV, a variety of TV series, films, news, and sports. The service has about 20 million paid subscribers. They are currently offering a deal for the Premium ad-supported tier for $29.99 for an annual plan.

How to Watch Local Channels Without Cable TV, Satellite or an Antenna

This is a quick article to let you know some places you can watch local channels if you don't want to sign up for an expensive streaming TV provider like YouTube TV, Fubo TV, or Hulu with Live TV. This article will be quick because there aren't lots of options available.

LocalBTV

I'll start with LocalBTV, which offers free over-the-air channels. However, while it comes with free local channels and a handy, easy-to-use DVR, it doesn't offer the major networks CBS, NBC, ABC, and Fox. But if you mainly want local news and public access channels, this may be exactly what you need. LocalBTV hopes to offer a Premium plan at some point that will include the major networks. However, those plans might never come to fruition if they can't strike a deal with CBS, NBC, ABC, and Fox. 

PBS

The PBS app offers free PBS content.

The PBS app includes a live PBS feed

CW

The CW app offers free access to CW shows. 

The CW app includes full episodes

Paramount+

You can watch Your local CBS station live on Paramount Plus if you pay for their Premium Plan, which is $9.99 a month or $99.99 a year. If you are a long-time subscriber and signed up when this service was CBS All Access, you should still have access to your local CBS for $5.99 a month or $60 a year. However, if you cancel and then sign up again, you will have to pay $9.99. 

Peacock TV

Peacock TV will be offering live NBC TV starting November 30, 2022. According to Tech Crunch "Peacock announced that on November 30, its Premium Plus subscribers will get 24/7 access to their local NBC station in all of NBC's 210 markets, including live TV programming like local news, sports, weather, and entertainment." The Premium Plus plan is $9.99 a month or $99.99 per year. 

Hulu

Hulu offers lots of Fox and ABC TV shows but doesn't offer any live streams.

Hulu streams many Fox and ABC TV shows

Sling TV

I'll finish with Sling TV. It costs $40 a month and comes with two local channels, NBC and Fox. However, these locals aren't offered in all areas. Check if they are available in your area before signing up.

YouTube TV, Hulu TV, Sling, DirecTV Stream, Fubo TV & Philo Side-by-Side Comparison


A few years ago, I did a side-by-side comparison of streaming TV services; since then, a lot has changed. So, it's time for an update. One of the biggest changes from my previous video is price. That's what I will start with.

One thing I have included is the price per channel. This is a rough estimate because most of these services don't provide the exact number of channels. For example, Youtube TV has 100+ as its channel count, while Philo has 60+. So, I use those numbers for my calculation.

The cheapest option is Philo. However, it's cheap because it doesn't have any local channels or sports channels. It has some news channels but not the big three: CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC. Philo charges roughly 42 cents per channel. The next cheapest is Sling. Sling does come with the big three news channels. However, offerings vary by plan. 

Sling has two plans: Blue and Orange. You can pay extra to get both. The Blue plan is the most generous, with 41 channels, while Orange has only 31. Blue and Orange combined offer 47 channels, so obviously, there is a lot of channel overlap. Sling Orange has ESPN, while Blue doesn't. It's actually very easy to switch between plans. For example, if you signed up for Blue but want to watch ESPN, you can switch back and forth. I've done it a bunch of times. Sling Orange is the second most expensive option based on per-channel cost. Sling also has a bunch of add-ons like a news add-on, kids add-on, and sports add-on. Sling does offer local channels, but only NBC and Fox. However, they don't offer them in all markets, so check if they are offered in your area before signing up.

Hulu with Live TV is the most expensive, but it does come with ad-supported Hulu. It's also stingy with channels, offering only 60+ for $70 a month. Fubo TV is considered the best option for sports. It also has the second lowest per-channel cost. It's on par with Hulu and DirecTV Stream in terms of cost but offers a lot more channels. FuboTV and DirecTV Stream have multiple plans. I only included their cheapest plans here. Check the description for links to their plans.


Streaming TV Price Comparison

Next is DVR space. Four of these plans offer unlimited DVR space. However, Philo offers unlimited for a year, meaning content expires when it hits the one-year point. Sling has the stingiest DVR offering with just 50 hours of space. However, you can upgrade to 200 hours for $5 a month. When the DVR fills up, the oldest content is deleted to make room for new recordings. This could be a problem if several family members are sharing the DVR. If you record a movie or show and put off watching it for a while, it may not be there when you are ready to sit down and watch. The only other limited DVR offering is from Fubo, but that is a more generous 1000 hours. Hulu with Live TV and Sling are the only services that don't offer a free trial.

Streaming TV DVR and Free Trial

Last up is simultaneous streams and the number of accounts or profiles. DirecTV Stream doesn't have profiles. However, it does offer unlimited screens at home and 3 on the go. Fubo TV is kind of confusing. If I understand correctly, all of their plans come with the Unlimited option, but that unlimited option allows viewing on up to 10 screens at home and 2 on the go. If you sign up for their Family Share add-on, you get an extra screen on the go. You can also purchase an Unlimited add-on. I don't know if that means you get an extra 10 screens for up to 20. They don't explain it very well. Fubo TV allows up to 6 profiles. With YouTube TV, you can have up to 6 accounts, each of which comes with a DVR. However, only 3 accounts can be used at the same time. 

When I made my video three years ago, a few of these providers had a two-screen limit. Hulu with Live TV is the only holdout. They still only allow viewing on 2 screens. You can pay $9.99 to get Unlimited screens and 3 on the go. Hulu allows up to 6 profiles. Sling TV doesn't have profiles. The Orange plan allows viewing on only one screen. The Blue Plan is more generous, allowing 3 simultaneous streams. If you pay for both, you can stream on up to 4 devices at the same time. Philo offers up to 10 profiles and allows streaming on up to 3 devices at the same time.

Streaming TV Simultaneous Streams & Accounts

In my opinion, YouTube TV and Fubo TV are the two best options out of these six. They have the largest number of channels and some of the lowest per-channel costs. YouTube has the best DVR of the two, while Fubo is better for simultaneous streams. Hulu with Live TV is the most overpriced based on what you get. It's $70 for only 60+ channels and 2 simultaneous streams. Of the two cheapest options, I think Sling has broader appeal because it offers two local channels in many areas, the major news channels, and some sports options. I hope this side-by-side comparison gives you some idea of which streaming service is best for you.

How Long Can Cable and Satellite TV Survive In the Age of Streaming?

Before streaming, television networks mainly made money from ad revenue and their share of cable/satellite subscription fees. Then Netflix switched from a DVD delivery service to a DVD delivery service and a streaming service. This delighted the networks, which had yet another revenue source for their content. 

Then people started cutting the cord, canceling expensive cable and satellite subscriptions in favor of streaming options like Hulu, Netflix, Prime Video, Fubo TV, YouTube TV, and Sling. Within a few years, millions of households abandoned linear TV. Many who held onto their subscriptions divided their attention between streaming and live TV, reducing time spent watching the networks. As streaming has become more popular, there is a rising number of cord-nevers. These are young people who grew up with streaming and have never subscribed to a pay-TV service, and likely never will. 

Why Audiences Love Black Adam But Critics Don't


Sometimes critics and audiences largely agree on how they feel about a show or movie, and sometimes there's a vast gulf between them. The movie Black Adam, based on a DC Comics character, is an example of the latter. It has a 39% Rotten score with critics on Rotten Tomatoes but a 90% Fresh score with audiences. The gulf is even larger when filtered for Top Critics only. They give the movie just 29%. So, why do critics dislike this movie?

The MovieFreak.com reviewer thinks Black Adam "is nothing more than a splashy two-hour coming attractions reel for future motion pictures...It's like the team took a Superhero Storytelling 101 course and this is their final project. This is connect-the-dots filmmaking."

Entertainment Weekly says that minor comic book characters getting their own movies "speaks not to unearthed gold but the restless, insatiable appetite of today's superhero industrial complex...Black Adam is what happens when artists say they want to go dark but don't really have the stomach for it."

The NPR reviewer said, "Black Adam seems perfectly content to pick over the wilted remains of the superhero-movie salad bar." According to this reviewer, Dr. Fate is equivalent to Dr. Strange, Atom-Smasher to Ant-Man, and Eternium to Vibranium. He also complains that the movie isn't political. The "homegrown would-be tyrant" is "put there intentionally to assuage, to reassure, to smooth any feathers that might get ruffled by the blandest suggestion of Western culpability in the oppression of even a fictional people."

The Atlantic reviewer suggests that the movie is nothing more than a money grab.
"Black Adam would be busy enough setting up the origin story of one new crime fighter, but it instead introduces half a dozen, each of whom will vie for space on children's lunch boxes and supporting roles in sequels over the next decade."
The San Francisco Chronicle reviewer doesn't think much of the DC lineup. "Can we just say it? When you get past Batman, Superman and Wonder Woman, the DC superheroes are a sorry lot." He also asks, "Is there anything more boring than two superheroes fighting each other, when you're rooting for neither, and yet the movie expects you to like them both? Of course, they can't hurt each other, because — wait for it — they're superheroes, and also because it's middle of the movie."

So, why did audiences love it? Usually, when I go through audience reviews, I find many that are fairly in-depth explanations for why a reviewer liked or disliked a show or movie. But there are few such reviews for Black Adam, even from Verified reviewers on Rotten Tomatoes. Many are nothing more than a line or two.

Travis thinks the movie has, "Great action. Need more of a back story and less characters."

First L says, "Tons of action, funny moments and a few scenes that were tugging at my heart strings."

Andrew is "not sure why the critics are trashing this movie ... its exactly what you hope to see in a superhero movie ... I actually liked that they had a lot more action then some others it seemed and they did not over use the comedy parts like some marvel movies have started to do."

Rena says, "It was sketchy at first but the end was epic"

Ron thinks, "If you like action..this is the one."

Marie78 says, "Surprisingly I enjoyed this movie. Towards the beginning I thought it was just a low budget take on Marvel characters but I ended up enjoying the film. It was action-packed along with comedy."

Jeff S had some issues with the movie, but mostly enjoyed it. 
"Other than a kid that couldnt act and a middling script, this was a blast! I love that DC is willing to give us darker heroes than Marvel (though I love Marvel as well), and Pierce Brosnan was FANTASTIC!!!"
Colleen says, "Fun, action packed anti-hero, hero movie! Everyone on point in this flick!"

Anthony H says, "Great film finally DC got it right!!"

Audience reviewers seem to love the movie because it's filled with action. The professional critics would have preferred something darker and more political with fewer superhero tropes. But between surging gas prices, inflation, the war, and the pandemic, many ordinary people just want an escape. They want something entertaining that allows them to forget their problems for a couple of hours. Black Adam provides that escapism by just being fun.


Is Disney in Decline?

Disneyland California Adventure

For decades, The Walt Disney Company wasn't just an entertainment business. It was a cultural institution. Now Disney is facing a lot of headwinds, so many that it may become one of the worst performers for all of 2022 on the Dow Jones Industrial Average. 

Disney Plus
The CNN article The magic is gone for Disney investors lays out some of the problems Disney is facing. That includes being one of the worst performers on the Dow Jones. A lot of investor concern is over subscriber numbers for Disney Plus due to what the article calls the "fierce battle for subscribers." Economic concerns are causing people to cut back on streaming, and Disney Plus customers in the UK are dropping Disney+ at a faster rate than Netflix and Amazon Prime Video.

Many One-Hit-Wonders Have Multiple Hits and Successful Music Careers

Some one-hit-wonders are successful artists who have sold millions of albums

When you hear the term one-hit-wonder, you likely think of someone who had one big hit on the charts and then disappeared into oblivion. It turns out that a one-hit-wonder is not so easy to define. In the Village Voice, Chris Molanphy developed Three Rules To Define The Term "One-Hit Wonder." The article points out some interesting facts.

Dark Matter in Science Fiction Versus Scientific Fact

Dark matter can't be detected even though it is all around us

The best explanation of dark matter I have heard is from the podcast Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe. This podcast is described as "a fun-filled discussion of the big, mind-blowing, unanswered questions about the Universe." In the episode What is Dark Matter?: How dark matter was discovered, and what it might be, they provide the simplest explanation for one of the most fascinating cosmological phenomenons.

 
What the Heck Is Dark Matter Anyway?
Dark matter is matter that cannot be detected directly. Scientists infer its existence because of the gravitational influence it has on normal matter. It bends space just like normal matter bends space. Think of dark matter as a ghost knocking over vases and pushing down piano keys in a haunted house. The ghost is invisible, but you know it's there because you see the effects of its actions. So what is dark matter?

Will LocalBTV Become a Viable and Legal Locast Alternative?

LocalBTV offers free streaming local channels in many cities

When Locast shut down after losing a legal battle with the major networks, millions of users were left without access to local channels at an affordable price. Antennas offer free access to these channels, but many people live in areas without good reception.

Imperfect Alternatives to Locast
Without a streaming option, many households either have to do without local networks or pay $60+ a month for streaming TV services like YouTubeTV, Hulu with Live TV, or Fubo. Sling TV is about half that price, but it only offers two local channels (NBC and Fox) and only in a limited number of cities. The cheapest option available for a major network is Paramount Plus, which offers live CBS TV on its Premium $10 a month plan or $99 annual plan (at the time of writing). Peacock TV provides lots of NBC content for $4.99 a month or $50 for the yearly plan, although not live NBC TV. Households with tight budgets don't have many good options.

However, there is a free and legal local television streaming service available in 21 markets as I write this. That service is called LocalBTV. By operating legally, unlike Locast, LocalBTV has a significant downside. It doesn't offer the major networks: CBS, NBC, ABC, and Fox. It only offers channels it gets permission to carry. LocalBTV is trying to obtain permission to carry those channels, but that may take time.

While this may be a dealbreaker for some, LocalBTV is an ideal option for those on fixed incomes, especially retired people. It offers PBS stations, various foreign language options, and channels showing reruns of classic dramas and sitcoms. 

About LocalBTV
LocalBTV offers local TV stations on smartphones, computers, and connected TVs. It is owned by Didja, a company led by CEO Jim Long. He "has 30+ years of experience in the media and broadcast industry as a founder, investor, adviser and business leader. He received a BS in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from UC Berkeley and an MBA from Harvard University."

LocalBTV has lots of features for a free service, including 30 to 40 channels, 1TB of storage (enough to hold 300 hours of programming), customized channel listings, and closed captions. Users can pause, rewind and fast-forward recorded programming. The LocalBTV app is available for Roku, Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, and Google Chromecast devices.

The Major Networks on LocalBTV
LocalBTV wants to offer the major networks. However, if that happens, they won't be available for free. They will be part of a Premium package.

"The free version has 25 or more channels, but when we release our paid premium version you'll get more than 50 local stations including the major network stations."

Locast.org charged $5.50 a month to get uninterrupted viewing. It's unlikely that LocalBTV Premium would be that cheap. A subscription cost of $9.99 a month may be an attractive price for households that used to subscribe to Locast. After all, it comes with a DVR and other features Locast didn't offer. However, that low price may not be enough to cover licensing costs. It will be unfortunate if LocalBTV Premium costs far more than former Locast users can reasonably pay.

The other problem is that ABC, NBC, CBS, and Fox may have little incentive to be part of LocalBTV Premium. All the major networks own other entertainment companies. When they negotiate with satellite, cable, and live streaming TV services, they often use their popular channels as leverage to get their less popular channels onto those platforms. In 2020, YouTube TV raised its subscription price from $50 to $65 when it included BET, CMT, Comedy Central, and Paramount Network, owned by ViacomCBS.

Bundling channels like this means that satellite, cable, and live streaming TV subscribers subsidize channels they never watch. Having access to local networks is a big reason many people continue to pay hundreds a year for dozens of channels they don't need. The major networks may have little incentive to join LocalBTV if that could potentially draw some viewers away from platforms that subsidize their less popular offerings.

LocalBTV's Jim Long acknowledged this problem in the Fast Company article: This free streaming service has the local channels others lack:

“The networks have been really scared about cord-cutting because, not only do they lose revenue for ABC, they lose revenue for the Disney Channel, ESPN, and all that other stuff.”

However, there is potential to pick up millions of viewers who don't subscribe to any service that offers local networks. The major networks may gain from bundling, but they also lose because there is a vast untapped market of people who have learned to live without local channels. A large portion of this untapped market might find LocalBTV Premium appealing if the subscription price is reasonable.

Jim Long hopes to bring the major networks on board, but he's also realistic about the prospect.

“We’re running our business as if we’re not counting on it.”